Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

APPLYING CHOQUET INTEGRAL APPROACH FOR RANKING HIGH SCHOOL INNOVATIVE EDUCATION

Kerim Goztepe

Abstract


Innovation has become a driving force for the growth and success of businesses and governments, focusing not only on creating new products, systems, and markets but also influencing customers, competitors, and other stakeholders. Focusing on innovation and being innovative mean being the first one developing or applying something, or at least using something that is already available differently or for a different purpose. Several methods have been proposed in the area of innovation for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. Nowadays, the progress of knowledge technology and the increased competitive activities between organizations have added to the importance of decision making. Decisions are made on the basis of different criteria and new techniques. One area of innovation management is advanced innovative education in high schools. In this study, a model to rank high school innovative education using minimum variance capacity identification (MVCI) based on fuzzy (Choquet) integral is presented. The ranking of supposed criteria can be used for adjusting allocated resources to a high school education system to follow defined innovation objectives. The model developed in this study is applied to a high school education system, focusing on ranking criteria, such as creative and innovative thinking, research and information fluency, complex communication and collaboration which are of relevance for any education system.

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182

. Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merriiënboer, J. (2007). Teachers’ Perspectives on Innovations: Implications for Educational Design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 985-997.

. Margalef, L., Pareja, N. (2008). Innovation, Research and Professional Development in Higher Education: Learning From Our Own Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 104-116

. Jacob, W. J., & Gokbel, V. (2018). Global higher education learning outcomes and financial trends: Comparative and innovative approaches. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 5-17.

. Shojaei, P., Haeri, S. A. S., & Mohammadi, S. (2018). Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 4-13.

. Smith, J., Naylor, R. (2001). Dropping out of university: A statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 164(2), 389-405.

. Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Embong, W. H. W., Safar, J., Mohamad, A. M., Mohamed, A. K., Rahman, S. K. A. (2019). Nurturing compassion-based empathy: innovative approach in higher education. In Social Issues Surrounding Harassment and Assault: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 144-163). IGI Global.

. Steiner, G., Scherr, J. (2013). Higher Education for complex real world problems and innovation. A tribute to Heufler's Industrial Design Approach, Creative Education 4(7A2), 2013, pp.130-136.

. Larichev, O.I., Moshkovich, H.M., (1994). An approach to ordinal classification problems. International Transactions in Operational Research 1, 375-385.

. Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P., 2000. A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Computers and Operations Research 27, 757-777.

. Adler, N., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z., 2002. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249–265

. Cook, W.D., (2006). Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking. European Journal of Operational Research 172, 369-385.

. Köksalan, M., Özpeynirci, S.B., 2009. An interactive sorting method for additive utility functions. Computers and Operations Research 36, 2565-2572.

. OECD (2009). Universities, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Criteria and Examples of Good Practice.

. Wang, H., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). An integrated MCDM approach considering demands-matching for reverse logistics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 199-210.

. Steuer, R., (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory. Computation and Application, Wiley, New York.

. Roy, B., (1996). Multi-criteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

. Baudry, G., Macharis, C., & Vallee, T. (2018). Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 257-269.

. Chu, T. C., Tsao, C. T. (2002). Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 43(1), 111-117.

. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer Verlag, Boston, Dordrecht, London.

. Rozman, C., Pazek, K. (2005). Application of Computer Supported Multi–criteria Decision Models in Agriculture, Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 127-134.

. Vanhaverbeke, W (2013). Rethinking Open Innovation Beyond the Innovation Funnel, Technology Innovation Management Review, issue 04/2013: Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 6-10.

. Chong, L.L., Ong, H.B., Tan, S.H., Lan, N. (2008). Innovative Educational Program. A New Edge of Education'. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8 (10), pp.1832-1840.

. Keeney, R., H. Raiffa, H., (1976). Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

. Stelios H. Zanakis, Solomon, A. Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, IO7, 507-529

. Hobbs, B., Meierm, P. (2000). Energy Decision and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods, Kluwer, Massachusetts.

. Belton, V., Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

. Kaya T, Kahraman, C. (2011). An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8553-8562

. Sugeno, M. (1974). Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, PhD Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology.

. Chen, S.J., & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

. Grabisch, M., Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M. (2000). Fuzzy Measures and Integrals, Physica-Verlag, New York.

. Park, J. , Han, H. (1999). Existence and unique theorem for a solution of fuzzy differential equations, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 22 (2), pp.271-279.

. Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. In Annales de l'institut Fourier (Vol. 5, pp. 131-295).

. Gwo-Hshiung, T., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Chapman & Hall.

. Ishii, K., and Sugeno, M., (1985). A model of human evaluation process using fuzzy measure, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(1), 19-38.

. R-3.5.3, 2019, https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/

. Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., & Meyer, P. (2008). A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European journal of operational research, 186(2), 766-785.

. Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., Meyer, P., & Kojadinovic, M. I. (2009). Package ‘kappalab’.

. Takahagi, E., (2000). On Identification methods of λ-fuzzy measures using weights and λ”, Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(5),665-676.

. Zadeh, L.A., (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1(1), 3-28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijece.v6i1.1347

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.