Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Arrangement of Congestion in Nonintervention Energy Power Market using STATCOM and TCSC

Jay Bahadur Singh, Santosh Kumar Singh

Abstract


In previous couple of years the electrical trade is freeing everywhere the places. freeing has brought several changes in organization and operation of power trade. This freeing will increase competition among power utility and permits the client to settle on their provider of electricity. range of participant can increase within the competitive market of power trade and every one the participant can attempt to get provide at low price sources. once freeing of power market, congestion in electrical grid is sort of typically. So, it's important to alleviate downside of congestion. downside of congestion, oftentimes occur in gear mechanism and distribution system. This paper proposes FACTS devices to alleviate from congestion. FACTS devices can expeditiously management the facility flow. Modeling, simulation and analysis of 5-bus system victimization MATLAB is explained during this paper. Comparison with and while not STATCOM and TCSC is completed to regulate the facility flow and result's obtained.


Full Text:

PDF

References


D. Povh, D. Retzmann Siemens, Erlangen, Germany. Development of facts for transmission systems. Transnational Electrical Interconnection and Sustainability in Central America. IERE. San Jose, Costa Rica, November 23-28, 2003. 1-10 p.

Karthika P L, Jasmy Paul,” Congestion management in power system using TCSC” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). Aug-2015; 02(05): 866-870.

Sankalp Asawa, Sam Al-Attiyah. “Impact of FACTS device in Electrical Power System” International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) – 2016. 03-05 March 2016; Chennail, India. US: IEEE Press; 2016.

Biplab Bhattacharyya, Sanjay Kumar. “Approach for the solution of transmission congestion with multi-type FACTS devices”. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. August 2016; 10(11): 2802-2809.

Alireza Seifi, Amin Shabanpour Sasan Gholami. “Power Flow Study and Comparison of FACTS: Series (SSSC), Shunt (STATCOM)”. In proceedings Seifi 2010 Power FS.

S. Meikandasivam, Shailendra Kumar Jain, Rajesh Kumar Nema. “Behavioral Study of TCSC Device – A MATLAB/Simulink Implementation”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2008; 2(9): 1958-1963.

Guowen H U, Ming CHENG, and Guilong CAI. “Relation between Fundamental Frequency Equivalent Impedance and Resonant Point for Thyristor Controlled Series Compensation”, 30th Annual Conference IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 02-06 November 2004; Busan, Korea (South). US: IEEE Press; 2005.

C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel, E. Acha, and H. Ambriz-PBrez, “A Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator Model for the Power Flow Solution of Practical Power Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. February 2000; 15(1): 58- 64.

Geng Juncheng, Tong luyuan, Ge Jun, Wang Zhonghong, “Mathematical Model for describing characteristics of TCSC”. Proceedings. International Conference on Power System Technology. 13-17 October 2002; Kunming, China. IEEE 2002. 14981-502 p.

L. F. W. de Souza, E. H. Watanabe, J. E. R. Alves, L. A. S. Pilotto. “Thyristor and Gate Controlled Series Capacitors Comparisonof Components Rating”, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting. 13-17 July 2003; Toronto, ON, Canada. 2542-2547 p.

Ramey, D., Nelson, R., Bian, J., et al. “Use of FACTS power flow controllers to enhance transmission transfer limits. Proc. American Power Conf., 1994; 56 (Part 1): 712–718.

Rajaraman, R., Alvarado, F., Maniaci, A., et al.: ‘Determination of location and amount of series compensation to increase power transfer capability’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1998, 13, (2): 294–299.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.