PCOS PREDICTION & DETECTION IN WOMEN USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
Abstract
Pre-term abortions, infertility, and anovulation are all common problems among today's women.Infertility has been linked significantly to the disorder polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), which affects women of reproductive age. Women who are in their reproductive years are affected by this hormonal disease. The hormonal imbalance in women causes menstrual periods that are late or non-existent. Excessive weight gain, facial hair development, acne, hair loss, skin discoloration, pregnancy concerns, and irregular periods are all things to be aware of. are typical signs of PCOS, which in some women can cause infertility. The syndrome cannot be cured after it has been identified, however proper treatment can help ease its symptoms. Due to the wide range of symptoms and the existence of a variety of associated gynecological problems, PCOS is exceedingly difficult to diagnose.The energy and cost invested on a slew of clinical testing and ovary scanning has become a hardship for PCOS patients. To solve this problem, we suggest a method based on an ideal and basic set of characteristics that can help in the early identification and prediction of PCOS treatment. Machine learning classifiers such as Random Forest, SVM, Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and K Neighbors were used to predict the underlying state of PCOS in women. The CHI SQUARE method was used to determine the top 30 features from the dataset, which were then included in the feature vector. The Random Forest Classifier offers the best and most dependable accuracy, according to our comparison of the findings of each classifier. Prasoon Kottarathil owns the dataset used for training and testing, which is freely accessible on KAGGLE
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Saravanan, S. Sathiamoorthy, “Detection of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Literature
Survey,” Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology, 2018.
P. Mehrotra, J. Chatterjee, C. Chakraborty, B. Ghoshdastidar and S. Ghoshdastidar, "Automated
screening of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome using machine learning techniques," 2011 Annual IEEE
India Conference, Hyderabad, 2011, pp. 1-5. Rotterdam EA-SPCWG. Revised 2003 consensus on
diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril.
;81(1):19- 25.
Zhang, X.Z., Pang, Y.L., Wang, X. and Li, Y.H., 2018. Computational characterization and
identification of human polycystic ovary syndrome genes. Scientific reports, 8(1), p.12949.
Dewailly, D., Lujan, M.E., Carmina, E., Cedars, M.I., Laven, J., Norman, R.J. and EscobarMorreale, H.F., 2013. Definition and significance of polycystic ovarian morphology: a task force
report from the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society. Human reproduction
update, 20(3), pp.334-352.
Vaidehi Thakre, Shreyas Vedpathak, Kalpana Thakre and Shilpa Sonawane. PCO care: PCOS
Detection and Prediction using Machine Learning Algorithms, December 2020 Bioscience
Biotechnology Research Communications 13(14): Pp240-244 DOI:10.21786/bbrc/13.14/56
Essah, P.A. and Nestler, J.E., 2006. The metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal
of endocrinological investigation, 29(3), pp.270-280. Norman, R.J., Dewailly, D., Legro, R.S. and
Hickey, T.E., 2007. Polycystic ovary syndrome. The Lancet, 370(9588), pp.685-697.
Amsy Denny, Anita Raj, Ashi Ashok, Maneesh Ram C, Remya George, “I-HOPE: Detection and
Prediction System for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Using Machine Learning Techniques,”
IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON 2019), 2019
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.