Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Effect of Packet Size and Power on the Performance of Bluetooth in Presence of 802.11b

A.S. Shirsat, D.M. Yadav, S.A. Shirsat, M.K. Kulkarni

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Last few decades, wireless communication shown significant development in terms of speed, bandwidth utilization, interoperability, and reduction in cost. This development is more in the free and unlicensed ISM band as well. In the 2.4 GHz ISM band, various versions of Bluetooth are developed alongwith other wireless Technologies such as WLAN, and ZigBee. Performances of these technologies are degraded in the presence of each other. Performance of Bluetooth used in this band for various applications affected more due to low power. Through this paper, efforts are taken to evaluate and analyze the performance of Bluetooth in relations with Bit Error Rate for packet size and power in a heterogeneous wireless environment. A MATLAB Simulink model is developed to evaluate the performance of Bluetooth for voice packets. From the results acquired, it is clear that the performance is degraded by 6 dB. To survive Bluetooth in this band for various applications, adaptive power and the adaptive packet should be incorporated.

 

Keywords: Bit Error Rate, Bluetooth, Heterogeneous, MATLAB, Packet, Power, Radio Access Technology.

Cite this Article: A.S. Shirsat, D.M. Yadav, S.A. Shirsat, M.K. Kulkarni. Effect of Packet Size and Power on the Performance of Bluetooth in Presence of 802.11b. International Journal of Digital Electronics. 2020; 2(1): 19–27p.


Full Text:

PDF

References


R. Challoo, A. Oladeinde, N. Yilmazer, S. Ozcelik, and L. Challoo, “An overview and assessment of wireless technologies and coexistence of ZigBee, Bluetooth and wi-fi devices,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 386–391, 2012.

N. B. Tshiluna et al., “Analysis of Bluetooth and Wi-Fi interference in the smart home,” Proc. - 2016 3rd Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Eng. ICACCE, 2016, pp. 13–18, Durban, South Africa ,2017.

Thaier Hayajneh, Ghada Almashaqbeh, Sana Ullah & Athanasios V. Vasilakos Wireless Networks, “A survey of wireless technologies coexistence in WBAN : analysis and open research issues,” Wirel. Networks, no. November, v 20,pages2165–2199(2014) pp. 0–36, springer 2014.

A. S. Shirsat, S. A. Shirsat, and D. M. Yadav, “Performance of Bluetooth in Homogeneous Environment,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7(4), pp. 506–510, 2018.

A. S. Shirsat, S. A. Shirsat, and D. M. Yadav, “Performance evaluation of pulse shapers in Bluetooth,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1227–1233, 2019.

A. S. Shirsat, S. A. Shirsat, and D. M. Yadav, “Performance of Bluetooth in the Presence of IEEE 802.11b,” Int. Eng. Res. J., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 117–121, 2018.

M. F. Yaqub, A. Haider, I. Gondal, and J. Kamruzzaman, “Self and static interference mitigation scheme for coexisting wireless networks,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 307–318, 2014.

M. A. Hosany and L. Chooramun, “Performance analysis of a data communication system employing Bluetooth and Wi-Fi standards,” 2018 Int. Conf. Intell. Innov. Comput. Appl. ICONIC 2018, pp. 1–6, Plaine Magnien, Mauritius 2019.

L. J. Chen, T. Sun, M. Y. Sanadidi, and M. Gerla, “Improving wireless link throughput via interleaved FEC,” in Proceedings - International Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 539–544, Alexandria, Egypt.

M. N. Ali and M. A. Zohdy, “Interactive Kalman Filtering for Differential and Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying Modulation with Application in Bluetooth,” J. Signal Inf. Process., 3(1), pp. 63–76, 2012.

A. S. Alghamdi, M. N. Ali, and M. A. Zohdy, “Robust Non-Coherent Demodulation Scheme for Bluetooth Voice Transmission Using Linear, Extended, and Unscented Kalman Filtering,” J. Signal Inf. Process., vol. 06, no. 6, pp. 9–27, 2015.

M. A. M. Mohamed El-Bendary, A. E. Abu El-Azm, N. A. El-Fishawy, A. Hagagg, and F. Shawky, “Throughput improvement over Bluetooth system through adaptive packets,” in Proceedings - The 2009 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems, ICCES’09, 2009, no. July 2019, pp. 616–621Cairo, Egypt.

B. Dezfouli, M. Radi, S. Abd, and T. Hwee-pink, “Journal of Network and Computer Applications Modeling low-power wireless communications,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., Volume 51 ,pp. 102–126, 2014.

V. Mohite and P. B. Mane, “Impact of Packet Size and Mobility on Heterogeneous Wireless Network,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 1093–1110, 2015.

W. Lee and H. Kim, “Channel Quality Estimation for Improving Awareness of Communication Situation in the 2.4 GHz ISM Band,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2002–2013, 2018.

M. Collotta, G. Pau, T. Talty, and O. K. Tonguz, “Bluetooth 5: A Concrete Step Forward toward the IoT,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 125–131, 2018.

M. Bin Yaakop, I. Arief, A. Malik, Z. Suboh, A. F. Ramli, and M. A. Abu, “Bluetooth 5. 0 Throughput Comparison for the Internet of Thing Usability A Survey,” in 2017 International Conference on Engineering Technology and Technopreneurship (ICE2T), 2017, pp. 2–7,Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

S. Raza, P. Misra, Z. He, and T. Voigt, “Building the Internet of Things with Bluetooth smart,”Ad Hoc Networks, elsevier,vol. 57, pp. 19–31, 2017.

N. Shahid and S. Aneja, “Internet of Things: Vision, application areas and research challenges,” Proc. Int. Conf. IoT Soc. Mobile, Anal. Cloud, I-SMAC 2017, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 583–587, 2017.

S. S. Salwe and K. K. Naik, “Heterogeneous Wireless Network for IoT Applications,” IETE Tech. Rev. (Institution Electron. Telecommun. Eng. India), vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.