An Exploration on algorithms of Energy Efficient Hierarchical routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/jscrs.v7i1.1551Abstract
The plan of vitality productive remote sensor systems is, be that as it may, a difficult issue. On one hand, vitality compelled sensors are asset constrained as far as memory and computational limits, which forestall the utilization of complex calculations and makes customary conventions of the TCP/IP stack not appropriate. WSN, on the other hand, are designed for specific applications, as opposed to other systems. These applications go from little size human services supervision frameworks to huge scope condition observing. As a result, any WSN business must meet a slew of requirements, each of which differs from one application to the next. As an outcome, vitality sparing strategies for the most part exchange off lifetime augmentation with other improvement destinations.
References
J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey, Computer Networks 52 (2008) 2292–2330.
G. Anastasi, M. Conti, M. Di Francesco, A. Passarella, Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey, Ad Hoc Networks 7 (2009) 537–568.
R. Rajagopalan, P. K. Varshney, Data-aggregation techniques in sensor networks: a survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 8 (2006) 48–63.
K. Akkaya, M. Younis, A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Networks 3 (2005) 325–349.
S. Sudevalayam, P. Kulkarni, Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 13 (2011) 443–461.
H. A. Nguyen, A. Forster, D. Puccinelli, S. Giordano, Sensor node lifetime: An experimental study, in: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Seattle, WA, 2011, pp. 202–207.
