Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
A Compared With control of Signal Processing Focused Method to Speed Catalyst Development; A Review
Abstract
In comparison to laboratory catalysis, statistical catalysis utilizes estimations such as density functional theory (DFT) to measure the characteristics of situations regarding. However, DFT estimates for a wide number of primary organisms on a range of recreational site systems are energy intensive. Throughout this work, we are developing a deep learning predictive framework for adsorption energy of intermediary organisms, which can effectively eliminate numerical overheads. Ours work involves the analysis and creation of suitable machine learning models and successful fingerprints or descriptors to easily determine energy in various contexts. In addition, the Bayesian analogous problem, which combines theoretical catalytic activity with its numerical equivalent, uses Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches to refine the ambiguity of the quantity of interest, such as the show transparency. However a significant number with forward experiments needed by MCMC may become a bottleneck, particularly in computational catalysis, where the assessment of normal distributions involves seeking a response for microkinetic models. An innovative and quicker MCMC approach is suggested to minimize the amount of costly goal assessments and to minimize the burn-in time by replicating the target coupled with a more informed delivery of the plan.
Keywords: ANN, Density functional theory (DFT), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm, Transition state theory (TST).
References
Djolonga J, Krause A, Cevher V.
High-dimensional gaussian process
bandits. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst
, C Curran Associates;2013:1025–
Andilla FD, Hamprecht FA. Learning
multi-level sparse representations. In:
Burges CJC, Bottou L, Welling M,
Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ,
International Journal of Electrical Machines & Drives
Vol. 6: Issue 2
www.journalspub.com
IJEMD (2020) 24–32 © JournalsPub 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 30
editors. Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems 26.
Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates,
Inc; 2013. pp. 818–826.
Imani F, Cheng C, Chen R, Yang H.
Nested gaussian process modeling
and imputation of high-dimensional
incomplete data under uncertainty.
IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng.
;9(4):315–26. doi:
1080/24725579.2019.1583704.
Tripathy R, Bilionis I, Gonzalez M.
Gaussian processes with built-in
dimensionality reduction: applications
to high-dimensional uncertainty
propagation. J Comp Phys.
;321:191–223. doi:
1016/j.jcp.2016.05.039.
Meier F, Hennig P, Schaal S.
Incremental local gaussian regression
in Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems. 2014, pp. 972–
Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND,
Weinberger KQ, editors. Curran
Associates. Inc. 2014. p. 972–80.
Nguyen-Tuong D, Seeger M, Peters J.
Local gaussian process regression for
real time online model learning and
control. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst.
;21:1193–200.
Robert CP, Casella G. The
Metropolis-hastings algorithm.
Springer Texts in Statistics New
York. 1999:231–83. doi:
1007/978–1–4757–3071–5_6.
Shahriari B, Swersky K, Wang Z,
Adams RP, de Freitas N. “Taking the
human out of the loop: a review of
Bayesian optimization.” Oxford,
Toronto: Universities of Harvard, and
Google DeepMind [Tech Rep]; 2015.
Nguyen V. Bayesian optimization for
accelerating hyper-parameter tuningin
IEEE Second International
Conference on Artificial Intelligence
and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE),
June 2019; 2019. p. 302–5.
Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes
for machine learning. In: Gaussian
processes for machine learning. MIT
Press; 2006.
Murphy KP. Machine learning a
probabilistic perspective. MIT Press;
Lorenz EN. Deterministic
nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci.
;20(2):130–41. doi:
1175/1520–0469(1963)020
<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Székely GJ, Rizzo ML. Energy
statistics: A class of statistics based
on distances. J Stat Plan Inference.
;143(8):1249–72. doi:
1016/j.jspi.2013.03.018.
Krauth K, Bonilla EV, Cutajar K,
Filippone M. Autogp: exploring.
Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes to
speed up hybrid Monte Carlo for
expensive. In: Bayesian integrals. the
th Valencia International Meeting,
pp. 651–659.
Bernardo JM, Bayarri MJ, Berger JO,
Dawid AP, Heckerman D, Smith
AFM, West M, editors Bayesian
Statistics 7. Oxford University Press;
p. 651–9.
Christen JA, Fox C. Markov chain
Monte Carlo using an approximation.
J Comp Graph Stat. 2005;14(4):795–
doi: 10.1198/106186005X76983.
Chowdhury A, Terejanu G. An
enhanced metropolis-hastings
algorithm based on Gaussian
processes. Conference Proceedings of
the Society for Experimental
Mechanics Series Springer
International Publishing. 2016;3:227–
doi: 10.1007/978–3–319–29754–
_22.
Hensman J, Fusi N, Lawrence ND.
Gaussian processes for big data. In:
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth
Conference on Uncertainty in
Artificial Intelligence, ser: AUAI
Press, 2013. Arlington, VA: UAI;
’13. p. 282–90.
Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J.
Adaptive proposal distribution for
random walk metropolis algorithm.
A Compared with control of Signal Processing Focused Rayan Khan Ahmed
IJEMD (2020) 24–32
;14(3):375–95. doi:
1007/s001800050022.
Haario H, Laine M, Mira A, Saksman
E. Dram: efficient adaptive MCMC.
Stat Comput. Dec 2006;16(4):339–
doi: 10.1007/s11222–006–9438–
Larjo A, Lähdesmäki H. Using multistep proposal distribution for
improved MCMC convergence in
Bayesian network structure learning.
EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol.
;2015(1):6. doi:
1186/s13637–015–0024–7, PMID
Korattikara A, Chen Y, Welling M.
Austerity in MCMC land: cutting the
metropolis Hastings budget. In:
Proceedings of the 31st international
conference on International
Conference on Machine LearningVolume 32, ser. JMLR.org.
ICML’14; 2014. p. 181–9.
Quiroz M, Kohn R, Villani M, Tran
M-N. Speeding up MCMC by
efficient data subsampling. J Am Stat
Assoc. 2019;114(526):831–43. doi:
1080/01621459.2018.1448827.
Lamminpää O, Hobbs J,
Brynjarsdóttir J, Laine M, Braverman
A, Lindqvist H, Tamminen J.
Accelerated MCMC for satellitebased measurements of atmospheric
CO2. Remote Sens. 2019;11(17). doi:
3390/rs11172061.
Livingstone S, Faulkner MF, Roberts
GO. Kinetic energy choice in
Hamiltonian/hybrid Monte Carlo.
Biometrika. 2019;106(2):303–19, 04.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/asz013.
Sutskever I, Martens J, Dahl G,
Hinton G. On the importance of
initialization and momentum in deep
learning in Proceedings of the 30th
International Conference on Machine
Learning, ser. Proceedings of
Machine Learning Research Dasgupta
S, McAllester D, editors. Vol. 28, no.
Atlanta: PMLR; Jun 17–19 2013.
p. 1139–47.
Hanin A, Rolnick D. How to start
training: the effect of initialization
and architecture. Adv Neural Inf
Process Syst 31 Curran
Associates;2018:571–81.
Vehbi Olgac A, Karlik B.
Performance analysis of various
activation functions in generalized
MLP architectures of neural
networks. Int J Artif Intell Expert
Syst. 2011;1:111–22, 02.
Tan TG, Teo J, Anthony P. A
comparative investigation of nonlinear activation functions in neural
controllers for search-based game ai
engineering. Artif Intell Rev. Jan
;41(1):1–25. doi:
1007/s10462–011–9294-y.
Byrd MR, Jarvis SA, Bhalerao AH.
Reducing the run-time of MCMC
programs by multithreading on SMP
architectures. In: Parallel Distrib
Process. IPDPS 2008. IEEE
International Symposium on. Vol.
; 2008. p. 1–8.
Ahn S, Shahbaba B, Welling M.
’Distributed stochastic gradient
MCMC,’in. Proceedings of the 31st
international conference on Machine
Learning (ICML-14). Proceedings.
JMLR Workshop and Conference;
p. 1044–52.
Collins CR, Gordon GJ, von
Lilienfeld OA, Yaron DJ. Constant
size descriptors for accurate machine
learning models of molecular
properties. J Chem Phys. Jun
;148(24):241718. doi:
1063/1.5020441, PMID 29960361.
LeCun Y, Haffner P, Bottou L,
Bengio Y. Object recognition with
gradient-based learning. Shape
Contour Grouping Comput Vis.
:319–45. doi: 10.1007/3–540–
–6_19.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive
fields of single neurones in the cat’s
International Journal of Electrical Machines & Drives
Vol. 6: Issue 2
www.journalspub.com
IJEMD (2020) 24–32 © JournalsPub 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 32
striate cortex. J Physiol. Oct
;148(3):574–91. doi:
1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308,
PMID 14403679.
Ringach DL. Mapping receptive
fields in primary visual cortex. J
Physiol. Aug 2004;558(Pt 3):717–28.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065771,
PMID 15155794.
Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y,
Haffner P. Gradient-based learning
applied to document recognition. Proc
IEEE. Nov 1998;86(11):2278–324.
doi: 10.1109/5.726791.
Choromanska A, Henaff M, Mathieu
M, Arous GB, LeCun Y. The loss
surfaces of multilayer networks in
Proceedings of the Eighteenth
International Conference on Artificial
Intelligence and Statistics, ser.
Proceedings of Machine.
Learning research, G. Lebanon and
S.V.N. Vishwanathan, Eds., vol. 38.
San Diego: PMLR, May 09–12 2015,
pp. 192–204.
Wu Z, Ramsundar B, Feinberg EN,
Gomes J, Geniesse C, Pappu AS,
Leswing K, Pande V. Moleculenet: a
benchmark for molecular machine
learning. Chem Sci. 2018;9(2):513–
doi: 10.1039/c7sc02664a, PMID
Kearnes S, McCloskey K, Berndl M,
Pande V, Riley P. Molecular graph
convolutions: moving beyond
fingerprints. J Comput Aid Mol Des.
Aug 2016;30(8):595–608. doi:
1007/s10822–016–9938–8, PMID
Duvenaud D, Maclaurin D, AguileraIparraguirre J, Gómez-Bombarelli R,
Hirzel T, Aspuru-Guzik A, Adams
RP. Convolutional networks on
graphs for learning molecular
fingerprints. In: Proceedings of the
th international conference on
Neural Information processing
Systems-Volume 2, ser. Cambridge,
MA: NIPS. MIT Press; 2015. p.
–32.
Segler MHS, Kogej T, Tyrchan C,
Waller MP. Generating focused
molecule libraries for drug discovery
with recurrent neural networks. ACS
Cent Sci. 2018;4(1):120–31. doi:
1021/acscentsci.7b00512, PMID
Torng W, Altman RB. 3D deep
convolutional neural networks for
amino acid environment similarity
analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. Jun
;18(1):302. doi:
1186/s12859–017–1702–0, PMID
Djolonga J, Krause A, Cevher V.
High-dimensional gaussian process
bandits. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst
, C Curran Associates;2013:1025–
Andilla FD, Hamprecht FA. Learning
multi-level sparse representations. In:
Burges CJC, Bottou L, Welling M,
Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ,
International Journal of Electrical Machines & Drives
Vol. 6: Issue 2
www.journalspub.com
IJEMD (2020) 24–32 © JournalsPub 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 30
editors. Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems 26.
Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates,
Inc; 2013. pp. 818–826.
Imani F, Cheng C, Chen R, Yang H.
Nested gaussian process modeling
and imputation of high-dimensional
incomplete data under uncertainty.
IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng.
;9(4):315–26. doi:
1080/24725579.2019.1583704.
Tripathy R, Bilionis I, Gonzalez M.
Gaussian processes with built-in
dimensionality reduction: applications
to high-dimensional uncertainty
propagation. J Comp Phys.
;321:191–223. doi:
1016/j.jcp.2016.05.039.
Meier F, Hennig P, Schaal S.
Incremental local gaussian regression
in Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems. 2014, pp. 972–
Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND,
Weinberger KQ, editors. Curran
Associates. Inc. 2014. p. 972–80.
Nguyen-Tuong D, Seeger M, Peters J.
Local gaussian process regression for
real time online model learning and
control. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst.
;21:1193–200.
Robert CP, Casella G. The
Metropolis-hastings algorithm.
Springer Texts in Statistics New
York. 1999:231–83. doi:
1007/978–1–4757–3071–5_6.
Shahriari B, Swersky K, Wang Z,
Adams RP, de Freitas N. “Taking the
human out of the loop: a review of
Bayesian optimization.” Oxford,
Toronto: Universities of Harvard, and
Google DeepMind [Tech Rep]; 2015.
Nguyen V. Bayesian optimization for
accelerating hyper-parameter tuningin
IEEE Second International
Conference on Artificial Intelligence
and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE),
June 2019; 2019. p. 302–5.
Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes
for machine learning. In: Gaussian
processes for machine learning. MIT
Press; 2006.
Murphy KP. Machine learning a
probabilistic perspective. MIT Press;
Lorenz EN. Deterministic
nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci.
;20(2):130–41. doi:
1175/1520–0469(1963)020
<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Székely GJ, Rizzo ML. Energy
statistics: A class of statistics based
on distances. J Stat Plan Inference.
;143(8):1249–72. doi:
1016/j.jspi.2013.03.018.
Krauth K, Bonilla EV, Cutajar K,
Filippone M. Autogp: exploring.
Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes to
speed up hybrid Monte Carlo for
expensive. In: Bayesian integrals. the
th Valencia International Meeting,
pp. 651–659.
Bernardo JM, Bayarri MJ, Berger JO,
Dawid AP, Heckerman D, Smith
AFM, West M, editors Bayesian
Statistics 7. Oxford University Press;
p. 651–9.
Christen JA, Fox C. Markov chain
Monte Carlo using an approximation.
J Comp Graph Stat. 2005;14(4):795–
doi: 10.1198/106186005X76983.
Chowdhury A, Terejanu G. An
enhanced metropolis-hastings
algorithm based on Gaussian
processes. Conference Proceedings of
the Society for Experimental
Mechanics Series Springer
International Publishing. 2016;3:227–
doi: 10.1007/978–3–319–29754–
_22.
Hensman J, Fusi N, Lawrence ND.
Gaussian processes for big data. In:
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth
Conference on Uncertainty in
Artificial Intelligence, ser: AUAI
Press, 2013. Arlington, VA: UAI;
’13. p. 282–90.
Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J.
Adaptive proposal distribution for
random walk metropolis algorithm.
A Compared with control of Signal Processing Focused Rayan Khan Ahmed
IJEMD (2020) 24–32
Computational Statistics.
;14(3):375–95. doi:
1007/s001800050022.
Haario H, Laine M, Mira A, Saksman
E. Dram: efficient adaptive MCMC.
Stat Comput. Dec 2006;16(4):339–
doi: 10.1007/s11222–006–9438–
Larjo A, Lähdesmäki H. Using multistep proposal distribution for
improved MCMC convergence in
Bayesian network structure learning.
EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol.
;2015(1):6. doi:
1186/s13637–015–0024–7, PMID
Korattikara A, Chen Y, Welling M.
Austerity in MCMC land: cutting the
metropolis Hastings budget. In:
Proceedings of the 31st international
conference on International
Conference on Machine LearningVolume 32, ser. JMLR.org.
ICML’14; 2014. p. 181–9.
Quiroz M, Kohn R, Villani M, Tran
M-N. Speeding up MCMC by
efficient data subsampling. J Am Stat
Assoc. 2019;114(526):831–43. doi:
1080/01621459.2018.1448827.
Lamminpää O, Hobbs J,
Brynjarsdóttir J, Laine M, Braverman
A, Lindqvist H, Tamminen J.
Accelerated MCMC for satellitebased measurements of atmospheric
CO2. Remote Sens. 2019;11(17). doi:
3390/rs11172061.
Livingstone S, Faulkner MF, Roberts
GO. Kinetic energy choice in
Hamiltonian/hybrid Monte Carlo.
Biometrika. 2019;106(2):303–19, 04.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/asz013.
Sutskever I, Martens J, Dahl G,
Hinton G. On the importance of
initialization and momentum in deep
learning in Proceedings of the 30th
International Conference on Machine
Learning, ser. Proceedings of
Machine Learning Research Dasgupta
S, McAllester D, editors. Vol. 28, no.
Atlanta: PMLR; Jun 17–19 2013.
p. 1139–47.
Hanin A, Rolnick D. How to start
training: the effect of initialization
and architecture. Adv Neural Inf
Process Syst 31 Curran
Associates;2018:571–81.
Vehbi Olgac A, Karlik B.
Performance analysis of various
activation functions in generalized
MLP architectures of neural
networks. Int J Artif Intell Expert
Syst. 2011;1:111–22, 02.
Tan TG, Teo J, Anthony P. A
comparative investigation of nonlinear activation functions in neural
controllers for search-based game ai
engineering. Artif Intell Rev. Jan
;41(1):1–25. doi:
1007/s10462–011–9294-y.
Byrd MR, Jarvis SA, Bhalerao AH.
Reducing the run-time of MCMC
programs by multithreading on SMP
architectures. In: Parallel Distrib
Process. IPDPS 2008. IEEE
International Symposium on. Vol.
; 2008. p. 1–8.
Ahn S, Shahbaba B, Welling M.
’Distributed stochastic gradient
MCMC,’in. Proceedings of the 31st
international conference on Machine
Learning (ICML-14). Proceedings.
JMLR Workshop and Conference;
p. 1044–52.
Collins CR, Gordon GJ, von
Lilienfeld OA, Yaron DJ. Constant
size descriptors for accurate machine
learning models of molecular
properties. J Chem Phys. Jun
;148(24):241718. doi:
1063/1.5020441, PMID 29960361.
LeCun Y, Haffner P, Bottou L,
Bengio Y. Object recognition with
gradient-based learning. Shape
Contour Grouping Comput Vis.
:319–45. doi: 10.1007/3–540–
–6_19.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive
fields of single neurones in the cat’s
International Journal of Electrical Machines & Drives
Vol. 6: Issue 2
www.journalspub.com
IJEMD (2020) 24–32
striate cortex. J Physiol. Oct
;148(3):574–91. doi:
1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308,
PMID 14403679.
Ringach DL. Mapping receptive
fields in primary visual cortex. J
Physiol. Aug 2004;558(Pt 3):717–28.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065771,
PMID 15155794.
Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y,
Haffner P. Gradient-based learning
applied to document recognition. Proc
IEEE. Nov 1998;86(11):2278–324.
doi: 10.1109/5.726791.
Choromanska A, Henaff M, Mathieu
M, Arous GB, LeCun Y. The loss
surfaces of multilayer networks in
Proceedings of the Eighteenth
International Conference on Artificial
Intelligence and Statistics, ser.
Proceedings of Machine.
Learning research, G. Lebanon and
S.V.N. Vishwanathan, Eds., vol. 38.
San Diego: PMLR, May 09–12 2015,
pp. 192–204.
Wu Z, Ramsundar B, Feinberg EN,
Gomes J, Geniesse C, Pappu AS,
Leswing K, Pande V. Moleculenet: a
benchmark for molecular machine
learning. Chem Sci. 2018;9(2):513–
doi: 10.1039/c7sc02664a, PMID
Kearnes S, McCloskey K, Berndl M,
Pande V, Riley P. Molecular graph
convolutions: moving beyond
fingerprints. J Comput Aid Mol Des.
Aug 2016;30(8):595–608. doi:
1007/s10822–016–9938–8, PMID
Duvenaud D, Maclaurin D, AguileraIparraguirre J, Gómez-Bombarelli R,
Hirzel T, Aspuru-Guzik A, Adams
RP. Convolutional networks on
graphs for learning molecular
fingerprints. In: Proceedings of the
th international conference on
Neural Information processing
Systems-Volume 2, ser. Cambridge,
MA: NIPS. MIT Press; 2015. p.
–32.
Segler MHS, Kogej T, Tyrchan C,
Waller MP. Generating focused
molecule libraries for drug discovery
with recurrent neural networks. ACS
Cent Sci. 2018;4(1):120–31. doi:
1021/acscentsci.7b00512, PMID
Torng W, Altman RB. 3D deep
convolutional neural networks for
amino acid environment similarity
analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. Jun
;18(1):302. doi:
1186/s12859–017–1702–0, PMID
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.