Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
The ICT Literacy Based on Hybrid framework by using Data Mining; A Review
Abstract
The task of the ICT literacy system although various attempts have been made in the recent past to establish a framework for assessing ICT literacy, the suggested framework described here is focused on a clear belief that mastery of technology alone does not establish ICT literacy. It is only through combining technology skills and cognitive skills, such as conventional literacy, numeracy and problem-solving, that ICT literacy can be properly described. The Panel envisages its structure as the basis for the design and execution of large-scale national and international evaluations, as well as screening tests of human life skills relevant to information and communication technologies. Summary of Recommendations In addition to taking initial steps in identifying ICT literacy and developing a framework, the group settled on a detailed set of policy recommendations.
References
Akbaba S, Kurubacak G. Teachers’ attitudes towards technology. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 1998. p. 845–8.
Anderson J. The Australian College of Education review: 1996 in retrospect (the Year of the Net). Unicorn. 1997;23(1):3–15.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
Becker HJ. How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. J Res Comput Educ. 1994;26(3):291–321. doi: 10.1080/08886504.1994.10782093.
Bhattacharya I, Sharma K. India in the knowledge economy–an electronic paradigm. Int J Educ Manag. 2007;21(6):543–68. doi: 10.1108/09513540710780055.
Budin H. The computer enters the classroom [Teachers College Record]. Teachers College Rec. 1999;100(3):656–69 [online]. doi: 10.1111/0161–4681.00007.
Christensen R. Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and their students [doctoral dissertation]. Denton: University of North Texas [online]; 1998. Available from: http://www.tcet.unt.edu/research/dissert/rhondac/index.html. Clarke DM. The changing role of the mathematics teacher. J Res Math Educ. 1997;28(3):278–308.
Coley RJ. Technology’s Impact: A new study shows the effectiveness – and the limitations – of school technology, September. p. A30–3 [online] http://www; 1997. Electronic School Online. Available from: http://electronicschool.com/0997f3.html.
Czerniewicz L, Ravjee N, Mlitwa N 2005. Mapping the landscape ICTs in Higher Education in South Africa. Report for the Council for Higher Education.
Dix KL 1999. Enhanced mathematics learning: does technology make a difference? Proceeding of the twenty-second annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Adelaide, 192–9.
Dix KL. Are learning technologies making a difference? A longitudinal perspective of attitudes. Vol. 5(5). p. 15–28 [online]; 2005. International Education Journal. Available from: http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v5n5/dix/paper.pdf.
Education Information Center. Is computer technology improving student achievement? [online]; 1998. Available from: http://www.ohioeic.org/computertechsept.htm.
Ezziane Z. Information Technology literacy: implications on teaching and learning. J Educ Technol Soc. 2007;10(3).
Fulton K, Torney-Purta J. How teachers beliefs about teaching and learning are reflected in their use of technology: case studies from urban middle schools. [retrieved on Jan 15, 2002]; 2000.
Galloway JP. How teachers use and learn to use computers. In: Price J, Rosa K, McNeal S, Willis J, editors, Technology and teacher education annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 1997. p. 857–9.
Glennan TK. Elements of a national strategy to foster effective use of technology in elementary and secondary education [A RAND Report]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. [online]; 1998. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2005. CT145.pdf.
Harasim LM, Hiltz SR, Teles L, Turoff M. Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. MIT press; 1995.
Jazeel AM, Saravanakumar AR. Role of ICT in transforming Sri Lankan higher education. Int J Adv Res Trends Eng Technol (IJARTET). 2016.
Levine T, Donitsa-Schmidt S. Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Comput Hum Behav. 1998;14(1):125–46. doi: 10.1016/S0747–5632(97)00036–8.
Lynch J. 1999. Introducing internet technologies: A study in four Victorian state secondary schools. AARE Annual Conference Proceedings [Online] Available from: http://aare.edu.au/99pap/lyn99492.htm.
Macmillan RB, Timmons V, Liu X. Teachers, computers, and the Internet: the first stage of a community-initiated project for the integration of technology into the curriculum. Alta J Educ Res. 1997;43(4):222–34.
Mandinach EB, Cline H 1997, March. Methodological implications for examining the impact of technology-based innovations: the corruption of a research design. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Marcinkiewicz HR. Computers and teachers: factors influencing computer use in the classroom. J Res Comput Educ. 1993;26(2):220–37. doi: 10.1080/08886504.1993.
Meredyth D, Russell N, Blackwood L, Thomas J, Wise P. Real time: computers, change and schooling. Canberra: Australian Key Centre for Cultural and Media Policy; 1999. Available from: http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/schools/publications/1999/realtime.pd.
Mlitwa NB. Dominant perspectives on ICT & higher education.
Mooij T, Smeets E. Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Comput Educ. 2001;36(3):265–81. doi: 10.1016/S0360–1315(00)00068–3.
Mooij T, Smeets E. Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Comput Educ. 2001;36(3):265–81. doi: 10.1016/S0360–1315(00)00068–3.
Moolman HB, Blignaut S. Get set! e-Ready, e-Learn! The e-Readiness of Warehouse Workers. Educ Technol Soc. 2008;11(1):168–82.
Nash JB, Moroz PA. An examination of the factor structures of the computer attitude scale. J Educ Comput Res. 1997;17(4):341–56. doi: 10.2190/NGDU-H73E-XMR3-TG5J.
OECD. Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [online]; 2006 [cited Sep 8 2006]. Available from: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/4/35995145.pdf.
Riel M, Becker H. 1The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher Leaders 1; 2000.
Ringstaff C, Kelley L. The learning return on our educational technology investment: a review of findings from research; 2002.
Ross JA, Hogaboam-Gray A, Hannay L. Predictors of teachers’ confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. J Educ Comput Res. 1999;21(1):75–97. doi: 10.2190/CGXF-YYJE-47KQ-MFA1.
Russell TL. The “No significant difference” phenomenon [online]; 1999, Raleigh: North Carolina State University [Website] Available from: https://spark.parkland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=ramage_pubs.
Sandholtz JH, Ringstaff C, Dwyer DC. Ensinando com tecnologia: criando salas de aulas centradas nos alunos. In: com E; 1997 tecnologia: criando salas de aulas centradas nos alunos.
Shade DD. Computers and young children: software types, social contexts, gender, age, and emotional responses. J Comput Child Educ. 1994;5(2):177–209.
Stevenson D 1997. Information and communications technology in UK schools: an independent enquiry. London: the independent ICT in Schools Commission.
Tolmie A. Examining learning in relation to the contexts of use of ICT. J Comput Assist Learn. 2001;17(3):235–41. doi: 10.1046/j.0266–4909.2001.00178.x.
UNESCO. Developing and using indicators of ICT use in education. Bangkok: UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education; 2003.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.